Advice I received… from a blogger
Posted by Keelan on January 9th, 2007
Leave a Comment
I’ve been considering advising a client to start a blog. An “official” blog that fully discloses who’s writing and paying for it.
I turned to a blogger I know, who has been in the sphere for a while, to see what he thought about the idea and whether he saw a negative aspect to doing this that I might not have considered.
I think I got some really good feedback.
I was advised that “official” blogs tend to be regarded with disdain in the blogosphere because part of the attraction of blogs is that they’re informal and honest. “Official” blogs are generally neither – they can’t be informal for legal reasons and they can’t be completely honest because that’s not the purpose of the blog.
The blogger felt that what blogs/bloggers do best (at this point in their evolution) is call “bullshit” when they see it. An “official” blog begs to be ridiculed most of the time.
I was referred to the last Canadian federal election campaign to see what was written about the campaign blogs for each party and each candidate – almost uniformly negative.
He suggested that if I/my client was going to run a blog, we’d need to somehow overcome that. Full disclosure in the header or top sidebar (who’s writing it, who pays the bills, the objective of the blog, etc.) might help.
He also suggested talking about the bad as well as the good, and maybe even having an area for open comments where those who disagree could engage in the debate.
He thought we’d win over more people by winning an argument with a dissenter on the blog than by putting out one-sided spin.
If we go ahead, we’ll being doing so with this insight in mind.

